case legislation Case regulation is law that is based on judicial decisions somewhat than legislation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case law concerns special disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or matter.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Should the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according towards the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a move into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, over the other hand, offers financial relief by positioning an employee in a higher spend scale, without shifting their position duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same pay scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they deficiency possibilities for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy tool used to reduce the hardship of extensive-term stagnation. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement from the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised with the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had nothing at all to fret about.
In the event you find an error during the articles of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that while considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must look at the benefit of all the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded with the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry check here or where the summary or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These include things like if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This could take place several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress on the concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, apart from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Furthermore, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.